Back to Search
Ashford
Forensics
week 4
CRJ 311 Week 4 DQ 1 Bite Mark Evidence

CRJ 311 Week 4 DQ 1 Bite Mark Evidence

Short description

Bite marks are no longer considered a way to specifically identify someone, but it can be used to exclude or include a person of interest. As a juror on a homicide case, you have heard an odonotologist discuss the bite mark evidence located on the victim and how the suspect cannot be excluded as to whom the bite mark belongs. Review the bite mark photo (below). If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion as to how the bite mark would possibly exclude the suspect.

If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion as to how the bite mark would possibly include the suspect.

The body of your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from this week’s required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.

Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. Respond to at least one classmate who has been assigned the opposite opinion of yours. In your responses, provide evidence to support your opinion. Each response should be a minimum of 100 words and should include your thoughts associated with their posted information. Additionally, you are to contribute to the discussion by adding support or constructive alternatives to your classmates’ posts.

Document preview
Image Preview
Back to Search
Couldn’t find your assignment?
human

Related Homeworks

Couldn’t find your assignment?

Send your Email and our manager
will help you find the right solution
Live Chat
+18882805042 copy number
FB Messenger