Back to Search
Ashford
Forensic evidence & the law
week 5
CRJ 457 Week 5 Final Paper

CRJ 457 Week 5 Final Paper

Short description

Prepare a paper comparing and contrasting the Frye standard, [Frye vs. United States (293 F. 1013 (DC Cir 1923)], with the Daubert standard [Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (509 U.S. 579 (1993)], for the admissibility of scientific evidence. At a minimum, the paper must include the following:    1. A factual history for both cases
2. The issues for both cases
3. The holdings of both cases
4. An explanation of the evidentiary standards used in both cases
5. A critical analysis detailing which evidentiary standard makes the most sense and why The paper should examine more than just the legal issues in the case, but must also provide an explanation of how courts view science and how that view has changed over the last century. Predict future evidentiary issues for forensic evidence and explain whether forensic evidence in criminal investigations and trials will increase or decrease over the next two decades.

Document preview
Image Preview
Image Preview
Image Preview
Image Preview
Back to Search
Couldn’t find your assignment?
human

Related Homeworks

Couldn’t find your assignment?

Send your Email and our manager
will help you find the right solution
Live Chat
+18882805042 copy number
FB Messenger